01 / What the framework returns
Band A.
Every year.
Twenty-five years.

What the framework returns.

The national waterfall allocates supply across four tiers: floor (essential needs), comfortable living, resilience reserve, and productive surplus. Calibrated against MBIE Energy in New Zealand data and back-tested across 2000–2024, the allocation returns Band A — no productive surplus available — for every single year of the back-test. EDGS Reference (62 TWh by 2050) and EDGS Growth (72 TWh) both remain Band A. Productive abundance (Band C or higher) requires roughly 90 TWh by 2035 — about double the current trajectory.

44TWh
Current annual supply.
MBIE · 2024
90TWh
Abundance threshold by 2035.
Inari Protocol · CM-0
25yrs
Band A back-test 2000–2024.
MBIE · audited
$89.8B
2050 GDP under Abundance Pathway.
CM-8
02 / What this means for policy
Volume.
And
composition.

What this means for policy.

The framework does not recommend a policy position. It does reframe the question. If New Zealand intends to be a country where renewable abundance creates new industrial value, the volume of electricity needed is roughly twice what current EDGS scenarios deliver — and the composition of new demand matters as much as the volume.

Food processing emerged as the largest single sectoral sensitivity in the wealth-per-TWh decomposition. That finding alone shifts the framing of any abundance-pathway debate. The framework provides analytical scaffolding for whichever pathway is chosen — including the choice to remain in the current Band A range.

03 / Methodology disclosure
Data lineage.
Sensitivity.
Reproducibility.

Methodology disclosure.

Data sources: MBIE Energy in New Zealand, Stats NZ, EECA, EDGS 2024. Model version: CM-0 v5 with sectoral decomposition CM-1 / CM-8. Sensitivity analysis run against population projections, productivity assumptions, and electrification rates. Confidence levels (A audited through E placeholder) are visible on every output. Full methodology is available under engagement; an abbreviated version is in the public library page.

Engage

A calibrated assessment for your jurisdiction.

The NZ case took the first calibration of CM-0 — roughly twelve weeks. Subsequent jurisdictions inherit the universal layer and require re-instantiating five cores. New countries are now 12–24 weeks to first instance.

Commissioned by national governments, DFIs, or anchor investors. Fixed-fee scoping precedes pricing.